That upstream narrative work cannot always be done from the outside alone, nor can it always be successfully delegated entirely within. Clarity and practical application often requires (particularly when conviction and direction have leaked from the organisation) both proximity and distance. But however they accomplish it, the organisations that do the work find that they become more deliberate and more coherent - not just in their communications, but in their decisions, their culture, their product, their conduct under pressure. The organisations that don't find that the activity never quite adds up to anything - and that consumers (and their own people) can feel the gap between the promise and the delivery. The infrastructure either gets built or it doesn't. The difference accumulates in both directions.

In the end, organisations don’t get the brand they advertise. They get the brand their decisions build. And those decisions either run on narrative infrastructure - or they drift.

AI removes the last remaining cover. In a world where everyone has access to the same generative capabilities, at the same cost, at the same speed, the only thing that differentiates one organisation’s output from another’s is the quality and specificity of the self-knowledge it was built from. If the model cannot clearly summarise what your brand stands for, what makes it different, and why someone should choose it, the issue is very probably not the model. It is usually that the brand itself lacks articulated clarity. So the good news is that AI will force marketers to answer the question it has spent the best part of two decades neglecting - "who are you?". You cannot prompt your way around the identity question, automate your way past it, or ask the machine to serve you an oven-ready answer. “Find out” - Dolly's instruction requires honesty about not merely what you said you believed, but what your decisions reveal you believed; what you could do and are choosing not to; and what you have become versus what you intended to be. 

At some point in the last few years, millions of people began having earnest, extended conversations about the nature of intelligence, the future of knowledge, and what it means to be human - conducted entirely through their fingertips, on glass rectangles, while their bodies sat forgotten in chairs. The WHO, in 2024, estimated that 1.8 billion adults - roughly one in four people on the planet - are now insufficiently physically active. The average person spends 44% of their waking hours looking at a screen. We are, in the most literal sense, losing the habit of having bodies. The irony is so complete it has become invisible. We are debating what minds can do, using bodies we have stopped noticing, in the service of building systems that will have no bodies at all. And nobody finds this strange.

“Late style arrives when you realise that you are: competent enough to write those things you wanted to write when you were twenty-five; impatient enough to have one more go at going all the way; angry enough not to allow anyone else to persuade you to do something else. At the same time, late style is cold, amused, contemptuous and savage about everyone you have been or ever tried to be. Late style is when the monster down there has finally had enough of you.”

How many brands and businesses I wonder, perform the promise rather than keep it, satisfying themelves instead with sending a double to the hard moment and hoping the audience won't notice the substitution? The airline that sells you a experience and delivers a call centre populated by underpaid contractors reading from a script at 11pm when your flight has been cancelled and all you need is a hotel. The hotel that puts "passion for hospitality" on its walls and a QR code on the table where a waiter used to be because they're "short-staffed tonight." The telco company that promises to make life simpler and whose customer service is a chatbot maze that would make Kafka proud. The bank  that's all about being on your side and then restructures its branch network into oblivion. The food brand that tells you about its sustainable farming practices - knowing that there is no legal definition of "sustainable" as a marketing term.

AI-readability is simply a new stress test for an old discipline: say what you are, mean it, make it legible, and let your decisions prove it. I will never get tired of quoting Dolly Parton – "find out who you are, and do it on purpose ".

We know that brevity in strategy is not performative minimalism. So why the industrial scale slide-count?

The end of the year approaches, so I’m writing this as a way of finding out what I now know. After a whirlwind year of motion, decisions, change, and consequence, I needed to pause and reflect what actually changed in my work, my thinking, and my sense of self - and what the year taught me about doing it on purpose.

Like what do you do when your brand has become a prisoner of executional formula and wants accelerate growth with a real long-term brand platform?

That was the challenge facing Corona.

Brand problems? I’ve seen a few…

Like what do you do when being a single malt whisky with a deeply authentic, hundred-plus-year-old story of craft and tradition isn’t enough of a reason to buy in an ocean of whisky with deeply authentic, hundred-plus-year-old stories of craft and tradition?